7061 East Pleasant Valley Road, Independence, Ohio 44131 • (216) 241-2630 / Fax: (216) 241-6516

News and Issues
User Info

9th Circuit says railroad law covered BNSF conductor, but tosses $1.2 million award

(Source: Westlaw News, November 8, 2018)

NEW YORK — A divided U.S. appeals court on Thursday said railway workers are not required to show that they were fired for refusing to violate a law or regulation in order to bring retaliation claims, in a case involving Texas-based BNSF Railway Co. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a 2-1 ruling said a former Washington state-based conductor’s refusal to abort a safety procedure was protected by the Federal Railway Safety Act, even though he wrongly believed that the test was legally required. But the court unanimously ruled that the question of whether Curtis Rookaird’s refusal to stop performing a brake test was a “contributing factor” to his firing should have gone to a jury, and overturned a $1.2 million award.

Full story: Reuters

Friday, November 9, 2018

Like us on Facebook at

Sign up for BLET News Flash Alerts

© 1997-2019 Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen


Decertification Helpline
(216) 694-0240

Sign up for BLET
News Flash Alerts


AAR reports rail traffic for the week ending April 13, 2019
Union Pacific reports Q1 2019 results
Kansas City Southern’s Q1 2019 net profit jumped 16 percent
PTC: Fifty years later, a lifesaving technology that could have saved over 300 lives inches toward completion
California port truck drivers awarded over $1.2 million for wage theft
Union Pacific VP Rynaski sells $1.496 million in company stock
Metra to start building 2 new Chicago stations after getting state funds
Transport Canada announces funding for rail safety improvements
Amtrak supporters appeal for funding for Hoosier State line
Q&A: Comparison of benefits under Railroad Retirement and Social Security
Get the latest labor news from the Teamsters

More Headlines