7061 East Pleasant Valley Road, Independence, Ohio 44131 • (216) 241-2630 / Fax: (216) 241-6516

News and Issues
User Info

9th Circuit says railroad law covered BNSF conductor, but tosses $1.2 million award

(Source: Westlaw News, November 8, 2018)

NEW YORK — A divided U.S. appeals court on Thursday said railway workers are not required to show that they were fired for refusing to violate a law or regulation in order to bring retaliation claims, in a case involving Texas-based BNSF Railway Co. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a 2-1 ruling said a former Washington state-based conductor’s refusal to abort a safety procedure was protected by the Federal Railway Safety Act, even though he wrongly believed that the test was legally required. But the court unanimously ruled that the question of whether Curtis Rookaird’s refusal to stop performing a brake test was a “contributing factor” to his firing should have gone to a jury, and overturned a $1.2 million award.

Full story: Reuters

Friday, November 9, 2018

Like us on Facebook at

Sign up for BLET News Flash Alerts

© 1997-2018 Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen


Decertification Helpline
(216) 694-0240

ND Officers Election Rules

Sign up for BLET
News Flash Alerts


AAR reports rail traffic for week ending November 10, 2018
Oil industry pushing North Dakota regulators to loosen oil conditioning rules for rail transport
Amtrak cuts operating losses to lowest level in decades
Amtrak to close Riverside call center, eliminating 550 jobs
APTA: Commuter railroads acquire all radio spectrum for PTC
Report: NJ Transit in home stretch of PTC installation
California high-speed rail authority narrowing down routes through Los Angeles
BNSF turns to hybrid-electric vehicles to “green up” operations
Q&A: Buyouts and Railroad Retirement benefits
RRB: Medicare part B premiums for 2019
Get the latest labor news from the Teamsters

More Headlines