7061 East Pleasant Valley Road, Independence, Ohio 44131 • (216) 241-2630 / Fax: (216) 241-6516

Membership
Benefits
News and Issues
Departments
Information
Secretary-Treasurer
Merchandise
Communications
FELA
Events
Links
User Info

High-speed rail rules dropped in face of freight rail opposition

(The following story by Bruce Rushton appeared on the State Journal-Register website on August 27, 2010.)

SPRINGFIELD, Ill. — Federal transportation officials have backed off a demand that freight railroad companies, such as the Union Pacific Railroad, either pay back federal grants or make track improvements if future high-speed passenger trains don’t run on time.

“It’s our land, it’s our rails,” Bob Turner, a Union Pacific senior vice president told the Omaha-World Herald recently. “This is about the government regulating what happens on our property.”

The federal government in January announced $8 billion in grants for high-speed rail, but little of the money has been spent while the FRA comes up with grant guidelines that act as conditions.

More than $1 billion is at stake in Illinois, where the federal government has agreed to pay for an upgrade to Union Pacific track between St. Louis and Chicago. Plans are to make room for at least three high-speed passenger trains per day that would make the journey in four hours.

The Illinois high-speed route runs through Springfield.

Federal Railroad Administration director Joseph Szabo announced last week that his agency was withdrawing its demand that freight railroads pay if passenger trains don’t meet scheduling targets, said Rob Kulat, FRA spokesman.

The announcement came during a briefing with a small group of reporters on the same day the U.S. Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood was in Springfield, telling reporters that the government was making progress in talks with freight railroads.

Szabo said the FRA should have consulted with the railroads before issuing the controversial guideline in May, according to The Journal of Commerce Online.

“It was poorly worded, poorly vetted,” Szabo said, according to the World-Herald.

Railroads have complained that passenger trains could hinder freight operations. In a written statement issued Thursday, Szabo said that freight rail “must be preserved and improved” and that grant agreements must protect public and private interests.

Richard Harnish, executive director of the Midwest High Speed Rail Association, said the government’s retreat from the guidelines issued three months ago show that the rules weren’t acceptable to freight rail companies.

“Since the railroads were the ones, when it really comes down to it, that are operating the trains, we need to make sure they’re happy and that they think this is a good business deal,” Harnish said. “The railroads basically said they would not accept any of the (federal grant) money under these terms.”

Harnish said he still believes the three-trains-daily, four-hour trip goal for the St. Louis to Chicago run is feasible.

“That’s kind of the floor, I think,” Harnish said. “The question in my mind is not whether they will meet that, but it’s how far above.”

Kristina Rasmussen, executive vice president of the Illinois Policy Institute, which opposes government spending on high speed rail, said the freight companies’ refusal to accept penalties for late passenger trains was a “smart move.”

Three trips a day is “absolutely not” worth more than $1 billion in taxpayer money, she added.

“Maybe we’ll get moderate-speed rail out of this – from a traveler’s perspective, it’s not a great time savings,” Rasmussen said.

“We can’t afford our current Amtrak service,” she said. “If we’re having a hard time affording our current service, why are we putting ourselves on the line for expanded service?”

Monday, August 30, 2010

Like us on Facebook at
Facebook.com/BLETNational

Sign up for BLET News Flash Alerts

© 1997-2020 Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen

 


Decertification Helpline
(216) 694-0240

National Negotiations

Sign up for BLET
News Flash Alerts

DAILY HEADLINES

Pan Am Railways goes up for sale
An observer’s view of the Pan Am Railways sale
NJ Transit claims “major milestone” in PTC progress
Amtrak to reduce New York-Florida trains starting July 6, with more cuts coming October 1
SEPTA Regional Rail is coming back, but many of its suburban riders are still working from home
Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles set records for container movement
Nebraska Commission files complaint against railroads for blocked crossings
CN plans nearly C$1 billion in capital projects
Norfolk Southern sold its Roanoke headquarters building for $30 million, less than assessed value
Passenger rail between Duluth, Twin Cities hurt by lack of state backing
Port of Savannah calls 10% container volume drop “better than expected”
RRB begins paying CARES Act recovery payments for unemployed rail workers
Q&A: RRB reports performance under customer service plan
Get the latest labor news from the Teamsters

More Headlines