7061 East Pleasant Valley Road, Independence, Ohio 44131 • (216) 241-2630 / Fax: (216) 241-6516

News and Issues
User Info

Opinion: Time to get moving on high-speed rail

(The following column by Rep. Don Young appeard at Politico.com on June 28, 2010. Rep. Don Young (R-Alaska) was chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee from 2001 to 2007 and is now the ranking Republican on that committee.)

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The need for high-speed rail in this country is real and urgent.

As airport delays increase, traffic on our roads and highways slows to a standstill and our current rail system’s highest-speed train chugs along at a pace slower than most cars, a high-speed-rail system would provide a welcome, convenient and safe alternative for American travel.

Over the course of many pieces of legislation, billions of dollars have been directed toward the intention of implementing a high-speed-rail infrastructure. But most of the money has gone to subsidizing the subpar system already in place.

When I was chairman of the. House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, high-speed rail was a priority for me. So I ensured that money was set aside for the development of these systems on both the East and the West coasts.

Billions in stimulus fund grants were to be directed toward the same goal but have gone, instead, to the operation and maintenance of the existing system.

A nationwide high-speed-rail system would reduce highway and air congestion, expedite the shipment of goods (as freight rail would no longer have to share tracks with passenger rail) and promote economic development — and is more energy efficient.

However, taxpayer dollars are continually being dumped into the subsidization of a rail system that is the modern-day transportation equivalent of a covered wagon.

High-speed rail — on par with that already in use in Japan, Spain, France, Germany (whose maglev, or magnetic levitation, train I have traveled on) and China — has the ability to provide a comparable alternative to air travel and would serve to alleviate air traffic and delays.

The average American adult spends an hour and a half each day driving in his or her car. Over a year, that amounts to 34 hours spent in traffic jams — contributing to the waste of nearly 2.3 billion gallons of fuel per year from all cars idling in traffic.

Using France’s high-speed train, the TGV, one can travel the 250 miles from Paris to Lyon in two hours. In the United States, that same distance takes roughly five hours on Amtrak’s Acela — the closest thing we have to a high-speed train, averaging about 83 miles per hour.

As the U.S. population continues to grow, so do our transportation needs. Our country’s infrastructure is, quite simply, not keeping up with the demand.

Meanwhile, our dependence on foreign fuel to keep our cars idling in traffic is growing exponentially.

According to studies, high-speed rail uses a third less energy per mile than does auto or air travel, and a nationwide system could reduce our oil use significantly — by up to 125 million barrels per year.

As a country that is currently beholden to foreign countries for its oil supply, this should serve as an incentive. Additionally, though some may worry about the high costs of implementing such a system, high-speed rail represents the kind of long-term infrastructure investment that pays dividends for decades.

Our current infrastructure system has paid for itself many times over, and a high-speed-rail system would do the same.

While President Barack Obama is pushing billions of dollars in stimulus bills that fund Big Government, he is missing a golden opportunity to stimulate the economy. Investments in infrastructure create jobs, plain and simple.

America is losing its global competitiveness for many reasons — not the least of which involves our inability to move freight effectively and efficiently.

Monday, June 28, 2010

Like us on Facebook at

Sign up for BLET News Flash Alerts

© 1997-2019 Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen


Decertification Helpline
(216) 694-0240

Sign up for BLET
News Flash Alerts


Shippers: Show us the benefits of PSR
KCS says PSR transition will benefit customers
Portland activists block rail line at Zenith oil terminal
Trouble ahead for New York’s Amtrak if Trump’s 2020 budget proposal advances
Senators push Transportation Department, Amtrak for answers on future of Empire Builder
Teamsters Local 528 members strike at Sysco over violations of workers’ rights
Third lawsuit filed in CSX Hyndman derailment
Union Pacific “pauses” construction of new $550 million Texas rail yard
NJ Transit: Atlantic City Rail Line to resume service on May 12
New Alberta premier aims to cancel oil by rail lease
Q&A: Comparison of benefits under Railroad Retirement and Social Security
Get the latest labor news from the Teamsters

More Headlines