7061 East Pleasant Valley Road, Independence, Ohio 44131 • (216) 241-2630 / Fax: (216) 241-6516

News and Issues
User Info

Top Texas official warns that building high-speed rail is a marathon, not a sprint

(The following story by Gordon Dickson appeared on the Fort Worth Star-Telegram website on May 6, 2010.)

FORT WORTH, Texas — Building a high-speed-rail network in Texas will be a long process, and those who wish to someday zoom across the state in rail cars traveling 150 to 220 mph should not expect instant success, the state's top rail official warned.

Rail supporters have expressed excitement in recent weeks that Texas -- which was all but passed over this year when the Obama administration pledged $8 billion for high-speed-rail development -- is finally getting serious in its efforts to connect cities by rail and perhaps qualify for the next round of funds.

But Bill Glavin, appointed late last year as the Texas Department of Transportation's first rail director, told the Tarrant Regional Mobility Coalition on Wednesday that years of careful planning lie ahead.

"The plan we produce this fall will not have lines on a map. We're not there yet," Glavin said. "We will have a list of potential improvements, public and private, freight and passenger rail, and we can begin to lay out the costs and the expected revenues."

This summer, Glavin's rail division plans to hold meetings across Texas to talk with residents about the prospects of connecting Dallas-Fort Worth to places such as San Antonio, Oklahoma City and Houston by the next generation of passenger rail.

Information from those meetings -- dates have not been announced -- will be used to create Texas' first official rail plan, a document that advocates say will dramatically help the state qualify for federal high-speed-rail funding.

Glavin cautioned the coalition that the first edition of the plan will talk about high-speed-rail corridors only in the broadest sense and will not even identify which rail lines may be used.

The state's initial effort will focus on developing a few corridors identified by the Texas Transportation Institute at Texas A&M University as candidates for high-speed rail:

The Interstate 35 corridor, including Fort Worth and connecting Oklahoma City and San Antonio.

Dallas-Fort Worth to Houston, with potential extensions to Marshall, Little Rock and Shreveport.

The Austin-Houston corridor, roughly along U.S. 290.

About $50 million in federal funds is available for states to study high-speed-rail corridors, and Texas is working with neighboring states to qualify for those funds, Glavin said.

Officials from Tarrant, Dallas and other counties are already debating the best places in the region for a high-speed-rail connection.

Opinions vary about whether it's better to connect the downtowns of Fort Worth and Dallas or to bring the trains to a more centralized location such as Dallas/Fort Worth Airport. From there, riders could catch local commuter rail or some other form of public transit to their destination.

North Richland Hills Mayor Oscar Trevino noted that Glavin repeatedly referred to the North Texas region as "Dallas" when talking about high-speed-rail corridors.

"We'd be happy if you called it Dallas-Fort Worth," Trevino said.

Glavin, who has lived in Southlake for years, apologized and explained that he had gotten in the habit of calling the region "Dallas" as shorthand.

Thursday, May 6, 2010

Like us on Facebook at

Sign up for BLET News Flash Alerts

© 1997-2019 Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen


Decertification Helpline
(216) 694-0240

Sign up for BLET
News Flash Alerts


Stopped freight trains causing safety concerns in Highland, Indiana
Blocked crossings become problematic in Abilene, Kansas
BNSF, Wabtec advancing the future of motive power
Bernie Sanders send pizza to miners blocking coal train
$125 million Baltimore tunnel grant opens double stack option for rail shippers
50th anniversary of major CT train wreck brings renewed call for PTC
Washington Supreme Court weighs in on the question of weight in Taylor v. BNSF
Alaska Railroad cancels passenger service between Anchorage and Denali due to wildfire
Amtrak adds service to two New Jersey stops
Japan’s past and future trains float and roll at SCMaglev and Railway Park
RRB Q&A: Unemployment and sickness benefits for railroad employees
Get the latest labor news from the Teamsters

More Headlines