7061 East Pleasant Valley Road, Independence, Ohio 44131 • (216) 241-2630 / Fax: (216) 241-6516

Membership
Benefits
News and Issues
Departments
Information
Secretary-Treasurer
Merchandise
Communications
FELA
Events
Links
User Info

A need for more speed from high-speed rail?

(The following story by Mike Kaszuba appeared on the Star Tribune website on May 12, 2009.)

MINNEAPOLIS, Minn. — Plans are moving fast to spend more than $1 billion on high-speed rail between the Twin Cities and Chicago.

But the trains themselves will not be as speedy as people may imagine.

As politicians and others jump on board, rail experts in the Midwest say the public's blurred image of high-speed rail -- based on Japanese and European models that streak across the landscape at 200 miles per hour or more -- exaggerates what the Obama administration is initially trying to achieve.

Planned high-speed trains to Chicago would top out at 110 mph, with an average speed of 78 mph. That compares with the 54 mph average of today's Amtrak trains between the two cities.

"There are people that have expressed a concern that we're not making that big leap into what more people would call true high-speed rail," said Mike Schadauer, director of transit at the Minnesota Department of Transportation.

Officials in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Illinois need to be more aggressive, said Rich Harnish, executive director of the Midwest High Speed Rail Association in Chicago. "We had trains running at faster than 100 miles per hour ... in the 1930s," he said.

But to go much faster would also mean accelerating costs. Once a train reaches 125 mph, safety requires tunnels or overpasses at all road crossings. One estimate by the Illinois Department of Transportation pegs the cost at $50 million to $100 million per crossing. Trains going that fast also would be unable to share track with slower freight trains, requiring that new tracks be built.

The cost of what some see as true high-speed rail can be staggering. Estimates of infrastructure costs for a 220-mph train running entirely on new tracks between Los Angeles and San Francisco -- roughly the same distance as Chicago to the Twin Cities -- have risen to $33 billion.

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

Like us on Facebook at
Facebook.com/BLETNational

Sign up for BLET News Flash Alerts

© 1997-2022 Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen

 


Decertification Helpline
(216) 694-0240

National Negotiations

ND Officers Election Rules

Sign up for BLET
News Flash Alerts

DAILY HEADLINES

CSX reports higher revenue, earnings in Q4 2021
CSX announces Q4 2021 results
AAR reports rail traffic for week ending Jan. 15, 2022
What’s behind LA’s shocking rail heists? Supply chain crunch, limited security, idle trains
UP calls for strong deterrence vs. train robbers
California governor unveils effort to help fight plundering of LA rail cargo
UP CEO signals interest in autonomous intermodal cars
UP says staff crunch from COVID-19 may hurt Q1 2022 volumes
RRB Q&A: Annuitants may need to increase tax withholding at age 62
COVID-19 vaccine mandates and Unemployment and Sickness Benefits under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (RUIA)
Get the latest labor news from the Teamsters

More Headlines