7061 East Pleasant Valley Road, Independence, Ohio 44131 • (216) 241-2630 / Fax: (216) 241-6516

Membership
Benefits
News and Issues
Departments
Information
Secretary-Treasurer
Merchandise
Communications
FELA
Events
Links
User Info

D.C.'s ban on hazardous trains may raise risks in nearby states

(The Associated Press circulated the following article on February 21.)

HAGERSTOWN, Md. -- A newly passed ordinance barring rail shipments of hazardous materials through the District of Columbia raises the risk of a catastrophic accident or terrorist attack in Maryland and other nearby states as the dangerous cargo is rerouted around the nation's capital, railroad officials say. CSX Corp., the train operator most affected by the law that Washington Mayor Tony A. Williams signed Wednesday, says that unless the measure is reversed, it will likely cause backups and bunching of chemical tank cars at its rail yards in Baltimore, Cumberland, Philadelphia and Richmond, Va. - places where hazardous cargo would be segregated and diverted to outlying routes.

"Such an aggregation of standing tank cars may very well present a greater security risk than individual cars moving in numerous trains," CSX warned in a petition asking the federal Surface Transportation Board to strike down the law. The emergency ordinance, which CSX also is challenging in court, bans "ultra-hazardous shipments" within 2.2 miles of the Capitol for at least 90 days.

Two trade groups, the Association of American Railroads and the National Industrial Transportation League, concurred with CSX and added in separate filings that the need for emergency preparedness would increase in small cities along hundreds of miles of alternate, less suitable rail lines.

"These consequences of forcing traffic over alternate routes are likely to actually increase exposure - and therefore reduce safety and security - as well as imposing added costs on our economy," the Association of American Railroads said.

D.C. said in its response to CSX's petition that such costs and delays are balanced by the benefit of avoiding a terrorist attack on the nation's capital.

In Cumberland, 140 miles northwest of Washington, Allegany County Emergency Services Director Richard DeVore said he's concerned about the measure's impact but confident he could summon the resources to respond to a hazardous-materials disaster

Maryland Emergency Management Agency Director John W. Droneburg also expressed confidence in the safeguards and enhancements to emergency preparedness implemented since the terrorist attacks of 2001. But, like city officials in Baltimore, Philadelphia and Richmond, Droneburg said the potential effects of the ordinance deserve closer study.

"If it really transpires that these things can't go through the district, it's going to take some time to assess which shipments are going to go which way," he said.

In Hagerstown, a Western Maryland city with a rich railroad history 70 miles from Washington, emergency-response planners expect an increase in hazmat shipments if the ordinance stands. Two alternate north-south routes have been mentioned during the debate - one owned by CSX west of the Appalachian Mountains that runs through Tennessee, Kentucky and Ohio, and another owned by Norfolk Southern Corp. that runs through Hagerstown between Harrisburg, Pa., and Manassas, Va.

"One would believe, just simply from a travel-time standpoint, that Hagerstown would be a more attractive route," said Washington County Emergency Services Chief Joe Kroboth.

Norfolk Southern, in a filing supporting CSX's petition, acknowledged that its lines "would be the only feasible alternative routing for most, if not all of this traffic." But the company also said it wouldn't consent to having CSX's hazardous cargo diverted to its lines.

Virtually all the filings opposing the ordinance, including one by the U.S. Department of Transportation, say that if the district is allowed to ban such shipments, other communities will likely follow suit, potentially blocking the safe and efficient movement of hazardous cargo.

Kroboth said he needs more solid information, not rhetoric.

"What we need to be able to do is have the knowledge of what really is the real threat so we can determine whether there is any gap between the threat and our capabilities," he said.

Tuesday, February 22, 2005

Like us on Facebook at
Facebook.com/BLETNational

Sign up for BLET News Flash Alerts

© 1997-2019 Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen

 


Decertification Helpline
(216) 694-0240

Sign up for BLET
News Flash Alerts

DAILY HEADLINES

AAR reports rail traffic for week ending Feb. 9, 2019
DOT issues final rule requiring railroads to develop oil spill response plans
Many companies, including Union Pacific, get waivers for steel tariffs amid tough trade talk
NJ Transit claims “legal precedent” shields it from federal safety lawsuits; Unions seek to set the record straight
Single mom with breast cancer speaks about struggles after being laid off by Union Pacific
California high-speed rail’s Central Valley segment is not stranded
BNSF bumps up spending on expansion projects this year as intermodal business grows
DOT-105 rail tank car safety the focus of 5 NTSB safety recommendations
Rail expansion through Port of Vancouver aimed at hiking imports from Asia
Amtrak, NJ Transit reach joint infrastructure spending deal
Metra seeking $5 billion from state to modernize “oldest passenger fleet in the country”
BRS announces Elvey elected Vice President of NRAB
Man convicted in Chicago gun case tied to NS train theft
Q&A: RRB reports performance under customer service plan
Get the latest labor news from the Teamsters

More Headlines