7061 East Pleasant Valley Road, Independence, Ohio 44131 • (216) 241-2630 / Fax: (216) 241-6516

Membership
Benefits
News and Issues
Departments
Information
Secretary-Treasurer
Merchandise
Communications
FELA
Events
Links
User Info

Small rail line to be focus of security test

(The following article by Alison Leigh Cowan was posted on the New York Times website on July 15.)

NEW HAVEN, Conn. -- About 1,200 rail passengers a day on Connecticut's southeastern shore will be expected to have their bags X-rayed and their tickets swiped in a month-long test of new technology designed to fortify mass transit systems against terrorism.

The test, which will begin with the Monday morning rush, is being done by the federal Department of Homeland Security. It is the third and final set of trials that the department has conducted since the deadly bombing of passenger trains in Madrid in March.

Shore Line East commuter trains in Connecticut were chosen for the third round of testing precisely because their relatively low number of daily riders could withstand the process without major delays.

"You don't want to do the test in the most difficult environment," said Asa Hutchinson, under secretary for border and transportation security at the department. This way, he said, "we can test without impeding the flow and speed of travel."

Shore Line East trains make eight stops from Union Station here in New Haven to Old Saybrook. Stephen Korta, commissioner of Connecticut's Department of Transportation, said the trains on that line carry about 1,200 passengers a day, each one picking up roughly 25 to 30 people per stop.

Passengers in and around Union Station on Thursday said they were supportive of the test. "I just believe in the safety of the people and whatever it takes," said Melanie Scelza, of Berlin, Conn., who was dragging a piece of wheeled luggage behind her.

In the first phase of testing in May, the Department of Homeland Security required passengers at a suburban train station in Maryland to pass through a scanner before boarding their trains. The scanner sniffed the air around them for traces of explosives. Carry-on baggage was also subjected to X-ray testing for explosives.

A second round of tests was conducted in June at Union Station in Washington. It focused on checked luggage and cargo. Results of that test have not yet been made public, but Mr. Hutchinson said that neither test caused any drop in ridership.

The Connecticut scrutiny will differ in one important respect. It will happen after passengers board their trains, with an eye to keeping the trains and their passengers on schedule.

Passengers will use one specially outfitted rail car to board their trains. Bags will be X-rayed by a large machine that is looking for images of known explosives.

Passengers will then be asked to hand a gloved attendant their tickets. The attendant will rub each ticket on a pad that can be read in a few seconds by a microwave-size machine that costs upward of $40,000. The machine can detect trace amounts of explosives on a document that has been touched by someone who has handled them.

Anyone who generates a positive reading from the ticket-reader or the X-ray machine will have to proceed to another, similarly priced machine that senses explosives using a different technology. There, an attendant will swab and inspect the luggage by hand and question the passenger to see if there might be an innocent explanation for the positive reading. Law enforcement officers will step in if someone is deemed a threat, and could stop the train if necessary.

Representatives of the devices' manufacturers said that it was highly unlikely that a passenger posing no risk would generate false positives from both technologies.

The American Public Transportation Association estimates 32 million trips take place a day on mass transit, more than 16 times the number of domestic trips by air.

Given the huge investment and possible inconvenience, Mr. Hutchinson said there were no plans to equip the entire mass transit system with the new technologies, only to learn what might be deployed if specific threats were made.

"Clearly, it's not something you do lightly," said Mr. Hutchinson.

Friday, July 16, 2004

Like us on Facebook at
Facebook.com/BLETNational

Sign up for BLET News Flash Alerts

© 1997-2018 Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen

 


Decertification Helpline
(216) 694-0240

Sign up for BLET
News Flash Alerts

DAILY HEADLINES

2 Chicago police officers killed by Metra commuter train while pursuing suspect
Unions protest at South Station over possible outsourcing of Amtrak jobs
Oil companies, railroads clash over tank car reform
Long-awaited NJ Transit reform bill sent to Governor for final approval
Amtrak to meet PTC deadline in Pacific Northwest
CP Rail unveils new high-efficiency trains
Teamsters reach last, best and final proposal with Anheuser-Bush
Genesee & Wyoming reports rail traffic for November 2018
Siemens, Alstom offer to sell high-speed train technology: sources
Ottawa to announce $1.6 billion for battered energy sector
Railroad Retirement and unemployment insurance taxes in 2019
Get the latest labor news from the Teamsters

More Headlines