1370 Ontario St. - Mezzanine, Cleveland, Ohio 44113 • (216) 241-2630 / Fax: (216) 241-6516

BLET releases remote control hazard study CLEVELAND July 27 -- Major U.S. railroad corporations should no longer be permitted to operate remote control locomotives free from regulatory oversight by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). That is one of several key findings in a report released today by the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen (BLET), which presented the results of a study sponsored by the National Division to investigate hazards created by remote control locomotive operations in the United States. The study was conducted by renowned railroad work organization expert Dr. Frederick C. Gamst and former FRA Associate Administrator for Safety George A. Gavalla. Their work included a review of general information and comments, as well as details concerning remote control incidents, gathered over a three-year period from remote control operators (RCOs) and from others who work or supervise in areas where RCO operations have been introduced. Among the study’s most significant findings are the following: Because remote control locomotives ultimately are controlled by on-board computers, RCO introduces a level of mechanical hazard into switching operations that does not exist in conventional switching operations. Certain design features of the “black box” actually may increase the likelihood that an unintended movement will occur. Blind shoves -- because of the lack of a requirement to provide human protection at the leading point of a movement -- undermines, if not defeats, the purpose of designated “remote control zones.” Training provided RCOs was routinely criticized as lacking in sufficient time and detail. The authors recommended that FRA audit accident and injury reports submitted by the railroads, so that reliable baseline data can be amassed for remote control accident and casualty rates. Further, that FRA refine existing accident investigation procedures to include studying technological or systemic factors that may cause or contribute to accidents. Finally, that the industry should no longer be permitted to regulate itself concerning remote control operations. BLET National President Don M. Hahs said of the study, “This is the latest piece of evidence that the industry’s hasty and ill-planned implementation of remote control technology -- and the FRA’s decision not to grant our 2000 Petition for Rulemaking -- have combined to diminish both safety and productivity in switching operations, which is precisely the result we have long predicted. The study also should have a sobering effect on those who continue to advocate a headlong rush to implement new and untested technologies.” Wednesday, July 27, 2005 bentley@ble.org © 1997-2010 Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen

Safety Task Force Hotline
800-306-5414

Decertification Helpline
800-393-2716

DAILY HEADLINES
September 2, 2010

•	BNSF worker on cell phone killed by Northstar train

•	Amtrak: Some Virginia service canceled in preparation for Hurricane Earl

•	SEPTA pilot program to capture, reuse subway energy

•	Railroad shares up at the close of September 1 trading

•	NJ Transit pays $267 million to purchase 100 new rail cars

•	NJ Transit seeks to add WiFi to rail lines, train stations

•	Texas DOT seeks TIGER II grant for Tower 55 project

•	Norfolk Southern targets carbon emissions-reduction goal

•	Progress Rail, NS announce order of four locomotives powered by Caterpillar engines

•	Firefighters have BNSF tie fire under control

•	BNSF railroad yard's health impacts studied

•	French railway faces criticism in US for WWII role

•	Steamtown's Railfest on the right track

•	RRB: Summary of annual financial report to Congress

•	Credit for military service under the Railroad Retirement Act

•	Railroad Retirement Board 2010 informational conferences

More Headlines

Enter your e-mail address to receive BLET news updates.

Subscribe  Unsubscribe