1370 Ontario St. - Mezzanine, Cleveland, Ohio 44113 • (216) 241-2630 / Fax: (216) 241-6516

Membership
News and Issues
Departments
Secretary-
Treasurers
Information
Communications
FELA
Events
Links
User Info

Fort Madison, Iowa, passes remote control safety resolution

CLEVELAND, May 20 -- The City of Fort Madison, Iowa, unanimously passed a remote control safety resolution on May 18, thanks in part to the lobbying efforts of the BLET's Iowa State Legislative Board.

Fort Madison, Iowa, is the 56th community in the United States to pass a remote control safety measure. The Fort Madison resolution seeks to effectively ban the operation of trains by remote control within city limits until numerous safety improvements are made. The resolution also calls to prohibit the transportation of hazardous materials by remote control locomotives.

Chuck Hintz, Chairman of the BLET's Iowa State Legislative Board, thanked Division 391 (Fort Madison) Legislative Representative Jeff Kurtz for bringing the resolution before City Council. Chairman Hintz also thanked Mayor Joe Kowzan, Councilman Neal Boeding, and Councilman Dave Sallen for supporting the BLET's safety efforts and for approving the resolution. Chairman Hintz said that Councilman Sallen's father, U.F. Sallen, is a retired locomotive engineer and member of BLET Division 391.

In addition to Fort Madison, 40 U.S. cities have adopted similar resolutions: Baton Rouge, La.; Detroit, Mich.; Shreveport, La.; Marysville, Mich.; Boston, Mass.; Cleveland, Ohio; Pine Bluff, Ark.; North Little Rock, Ark.; Beardstown, Ill.; Bakersfield, Calif.; Woodbridge, N.J.; Maple Heights, Ohio; Alliance, Neb.; Evansville, Ind.; Dupo, Ill.; Durand, Mich; Flat Rock, Mich.; Woodhaven, Mich; Flint, Mich.; Sparks, Nev.; Commerce, Calif.; Clinton, Iowa; Montebello, Calif.; Saginaw, Mich.; Mankato, Minn.; Wamac, Ill.; St. Louis, Mo.; River Rouge, Mich.; Melvindale, Mich.; Redford Township, Mich.; Irvington, Ill.; Berwyn, Ill.; Allen Park, Mich.; Central City, Ill.; Carteret, N.J.; Toledo, Ohio; San Francisco, Calif.; Houston, Texas; Janesville, Wisc.; and South Salt Lake City, Utah.

Also, 15 counties have passed similar remote control resolutions. They are: Douglas County, Wisc.; West Baton Rouge Parish, La.; Point Coupee Parish, La.; Cuyahoga County, Ohio; Huron County, Ohio; Erie County, Ohio; Whitley County, Ky.; Unicoi County, Tenn.; Contra Costa County, Calif.; Knox County, Tenn.; Clinton County, Iowa; Harris County, Texas; Roanoke County, Va.; Greenup County, Ky.; and San Francisco County, Calif.

A PDF of the resolution is available at:
http://www.ble-t.org/pr/pdf/FortMadisonRes.pdf

For more information about remote control trains, go to:
http://www.ble-t.org/remotecontrol

Thursday, May 20, 2004
bentley@ble.org

© 1997-2010 Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen

 


Safety Task Force Hotline
800-306-5414

Decertification Helpline
800-393-2716

DAILY HEADLINES
September 2, 2010

BNSF worker on cell phone killed by Northstar train
Amtrak: Some Virginia service canceled in preparation for Hurricane Earl
SEPTA pilot program to capture, reuse subway energy
Railroad shares up at the close of September 1 trading
NJ Transit pays $267 million to purchase 100 new rail cars
NJ Transit seeks to add WiFi to rail lines, train stations
Texas DOT seeks TIGER II grant for Tower 55 project
Norfolk Southern targets carbon emissions-reduction goal
Progress Rail, NS announce order of four locomotives powered by Caterpillar engines
Firefighters have BNSF tie fire under control
BNSF railroad yard's health impacts studied
French railway faces criticism in US for WWII role
Steamtown's Railfest on the right track
RRB: Summary of annual financial report to Congress
Credit for military service under the Railroad Retirement Act
Railroad Retirement Board 2010 informational conferences

More Headlines


Enter your e-mail address to receive BLET news updates.

Subscribe  Unsubscribe