1370 Ontario St. - Mezzanine, Cleveland, Ohio 44113 • (216) 241-2630 / Fax: (216) 241-6516

Remote-controlled switch engine collides with engine in train yard (The LaCrosse Tribune posted the following article by Joan Kent on its website on June 13.) LaCROSSE, Wisc. -- A Burlington Northern Santa Fe engine operated by remote control collided in the La Crosse railroad yard on Oak Street on Wednesday with a BNSF engine preparing for a local run. No one was injured in the accident that occurred at about 10 p.m., said Steve Forsberg, general director, public affairs corporate relations. The steps used to climb aboard both engines were damaged in the collision, he said. An engineer was in the engine, which was stationary before backing to attach to a train to go to Prairie du Chien, Forsberg said. The switch engine, operated by remote control, was pulling 11 cars south, he said. The cause of the accident was confusion in the communication between the yardmaster and the crews of the two engines, Forsberg said. Both crews thought they had the go-ahead to go on to the same track, he said. "The yardmaster failed to communicate to the people operating the switch engine that they were supposed to stop." The switch engine crewmen on the ground applied the brakes by using their remote controls when they saw the engines were going to collide, but were unable to stop before the impact, he said. The accident will not cause the railroad to consider stopping the use of remotes in the La Crosse yard, Forsberg said. Over a four-year period, there were between 10 and 12 similar accidents in the yard, when both engines were manned by engineers, he said. "This is the kind of accident that (remote technology) is helping to reduce. We have seen a 42 percent reduction in the yards since using the remotes." But James Kinsman, member of the Locomotive Engineers, said the incident illustrates the union's safety concerns. Railroad representatives said remote controls are safer because they take the third person, the engineer in the engine, "out of the equation," he said. "If there had been an engineer, the accident probably could have been averted." Friday, June 13, 2003 © 1997-2010 Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen

Safety Task Force Hotline
800-306-5414

Decertification Helpline
800-393-2716

DAILY HEADLINES
September 2, 2010

•	BNSF worker on cell phone killed by Northstar train

•	Amtrak: Some Virginia service canceled in preparation for Hurricane Earl

•	SEPTA pilot program to capture, reuse subway energy

•	Railroad shares up at the close of September 1 trading

•	NJ Transit pays $267 million to purchase 100 new rail cars

•	NJ Transit seeks to add WiFi to rail lines, train stations

•	Texas DOT seeks TIGER II grant for Tower 55 project

•	Norfolk Southern targets carbon emissions-reduction goal

•	Progress Rail, NS announce order of four locomotives powered by Caterpillar engines

•	Firefighters have BNSF tie fire under control

•	BNSF railroad yard's health impacts studied

•	French railway faces criticism in US for WWII role

•	Steamtown's Railfest on the right track

•	RRB: Summary of annual financial report to Congress

•	Credit for military service under the Railroad Retirement Act

•	Railroad Retirement Board 2010 informational conferences

More Headlines

Enter your e-mail address to receive BLET news updates.

Subscribe  Unsubscribe