press release, August 3, 2014) CH"> press release, August 3, 2014) CH" />

7061 East Pleasant Valley Road, Independence, Ohio 44131 • (216) 241-2630 / Fax: (216) 241-6516

Membership
Benefits
News and Issues
Departments
Information
Merchandise
Communications
FELA
Events
Links
User Info

Railroad Retirement Board financial reports

(Source: U.S. Railroad Retirement Board press release, August 3, 2014)

CHICAGO — The Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) is required by law to submit annual financial reports to Congress on the financial condition of the railroad retirement system and the railroad unemployment insurance system. These reports must also include recommendations for any financing changes which may be advisable in order to ensure the solvency of the systems. In June, the RRB submitted its 2014 reports on the railroad retirement and railroad unemployment insurance systems.

The following questions and answers summarize the findings of these reports.

1. What were the assets of the railroad retirement and railroad unemployment insurance systems last year?

As of September 30, 2013, total railroad retirement system assets, comprising assets managed by the National Railroad Retirement Investment Trust and the railroad retirement system accounts at the Treasury, equaled $26.7 billion. The Trust was established by the Railroad Retirement and Survivors' Improvement Act of 2001 to manage and invest railroad retirement assets. The cash balance of the railroad unemployment insurance system was $192.5 million at the end of fiscal year 2013.

2. What was the conclusion of the 2014 report on the financial condition of the railroad retirement system?

The overall conclusion was that, barring a sudden, unanticipated, large decrease in railroad employment or substantial investment losses, the railroad retirement system will experience no cash-flow problems during the next 25 years. The long-term stability of the system, however, is still uncertain. Under the current financing structure, actual levels of railroad employment and investment return over the coming years will largely determine whether corrective action is necessary.

3. What methods were used in forecasting the financial condition of the railroad retirement system?

The 2014 report projected the various components of income and outgo of the railroad retirement system under three employment assumptions, intended to provide an optimistic, moderate and pessimistic outlook, for the 25 calendar years 2014-2038. The projections of these components were combined and the investment income calculated to produce the projected balances in the railroad retirement accounts at the end of each projection year.

Projecting income and outgo under optimistic, moderate and pessimistic employment assumptions, the valuation indicated no cash-flow problems occur throughout the 25-year projection period under any of the assumptions.

4. How do the results of the 2014 report compare with those of the 2013 report?

The projected tier II tax rates for each calendar year are either the same or lower than in last year's report. (Railroad retirement payroll taxes, like railroad retirement benefits, are calculated on a two-tier basis.) The projected combined account balances are higher at the end of each year.

The favorable comparison with last year was due to overall favorable economic and employment experience, with the largest impacts resulting from employment exceeding the RRB's projections and actual investment return of approximately 16 percent exceeding the expected investment return of 7 percent in calendar year 2013.

5. Did the 2014 report on the financial condition of the railroad retirement system recommend any railroad retirement payroll tax rate changes?

The report did not recommend any change in the rate of tax imposed by current law on employers and employees.

6. What were the findings of the 2014 report on the financial condition of the railroad unemployment insurance system?

The RRB's 2014 railroad unemployment insurance financial report was also generally favorable. Even as maximum benefit rates increase 41 percent (from $68 to $96) from 2013 to 2024, experience-based contribution rates are expected to keep the unemployment insurance system solvent. Unemployment levels are the single most significant factor affecting the financial status of the railroad unemployment insurance system. However, the system's experience-rating provisions, which adjust contribution rates for changing benefit levels, and its surcharge trigger for maintaining a minimum balance, help to ensure financial stability in the advent of adverse economic conditions.

Under experience-rating provisions, each employer's contribution rate is determined by the RRB on the basis of benefit payments made to the railroad's employees. Even under the report's most pessimistic assumption, the average employer contribution rate remains well below the maximum throughout the projection period.

While no surcharge is in effect in calendar year 2014, this year's report predicts a 1.5 percent surcharge in calendar years 2015 and 2016. A surcharge of 1.5 percent is also likely in calendar year 2017.

7. What methods were used to evaluate the financial condition of the railroad unemployment insurance system?

The economic and employment assumptions used in the unemployment insurance report corresponded to those used in the 2014 report on the financial condition of the retirement system. Projections were made for various components of income and outgo under each of the three employment assumptions, but for the period 2014-2024, rather than a 25-year period.

8. Did the 2014 report on the railroad unemployment insurance system recommend any financing changes to the system?

No financing changes were recommended at this time by the report.

Friday, September 05, 2014

Like us on Facebook at
Facebook.com/BLETNational

Sign up for BLET News Flash Alerts

© 1997-2016 Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen

 


Decertification Helpline
(216) 694-0240

National Negotiations

Sign up for BLET
News Flash Alerts

DAILY HEADLINES

AAR: Rail traffic up 0.6 percent from 2015 for week ending November 26
Freight railroads don’t expect big changes under Trump
Baltimore Amtrak tunnel replacement would cost $4 billion
STB adopts final rules for Class I performance metrics, Amtrak cost disputes
Board members selected to oversee Amtrak’s $24 billion Gateway project
SEPTA unveils commuter rail improvement program
Cost of UP oil train derailment in Mosier: $9 million and rising
Is crumbling infrastructure inhibiting American productivity?
Rensselaer rail improvements expected to reduce delays
NS derailment damages 120 BMWs on their way to Port of Charleston
Keolis launches ‘biometric’ time clock system at MBTA commuter rail facility
UP crews breach Great Salt Lake causeway to restore balance of salt, water levels
NS says count us out of Great Lakes Basin plan
DOT announces $300 million for university transportation center grants
KCS Holiday Express, Santa’s factory bring Christmas smiles
RRB: Medicare Part B premiums for 2017
Get the latest labor news from the Teamsters

More Headlines