1370 Ontario St. - Mezzanine, Cleveland, Ohio 44113 • (216) 241-2630 / Fax: (216) 241-6516

Editorial: Amtrak service through Bismarck-Mandan is wishful thinking (The following editorial appeared on the Bismarck Tribune website on October 27, 2009.) BISMARCK, N.D. — Having passenger service for Bismarck-Mandan -- connecting to Dickinson, Glendive, Billings and Seattle to the west and Fargo, Minneapolis and Chicago to the east -- would be grand. We had that with the North Coast Hiawatha until 1979. And the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 reconsiders the route. For nostalgic and convenience reasons, many North Dakotans along the southline would find renewed Amtrak service a boon. Boon or not, it's a losing proposition, and Congress should not jump start the southern Amtrak route in North Dakota. There may be other routes worth restarting because they make good sense, but not the one running through Bismarck-Mandan. The early numbers show the revenue from such a link reaching 51.8 percent of the cost. That's an operating loss of $31.1 million a year. And we're told that's a good thing. Oh, yes, then there's the estimated $1.04 billion capital investment to get things going. And, where's our national debt? There's a lot about passenger line service that makes sense in North Dakota. It should be more economic than all of us driving up and down the interstate highway with one person in each car and truck. For those without personal transportation, it gives options beyond the bus or airlines. It would be a great connector with major cities to the east and west. Bismarck-Mandan also have powerful historic links to the railroad, and not just coal trains. The transcontinental reach of the rail that passes through our two cities provided the initial reason for creating these communities at the juncture of the Missouri River and what was the Northern Pacific Railroad. But then we already have east-west passenger service (is there any other kind) in the state. Amtrak now passes through Minot, a couple hours by car to the north. Given the high subsidy a line would require, doubling the access to Amtrak in North Dakota seems a stretch. Improving Amtrak service in urban areas, where traffic is heavy and highways and airways clogged, make sense, even if a subsidy is required. That cost in sparsely populated areas doesn't trim itself down in per rider cost to anything near reasonableness. William Thoms of the Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute at North Dakota State University has it right, "Man will step on Mars before someone steps off of a train in Bismarck." And that's the way it should remain. Tuesday, October 27, 2009 © 1997-2010 Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen

Safety Task Force Hotline
800-306-5414

Decertification Helpline
800-393-2716

DAILY HEADLINES
September 2, 2010

•	BNSF worker on cell phone killed by Northstar train

•	Amtrak: Some Virginia service canceled in preparation for Hurricane Earl

•	SEPTA pilot program to capture, reuse subway energy

•	Railroad shares up at the close of September 1 trading

•	NJ Transit pays $267 million to purchase 100 new rail cars

•	NJ Transit seeks to add WiFi to rail lines, train stations

•	Texas DOT seeks TIGER II grant for Tower 55 project

•	Norfolk Southern targets carbon emissions-reduction goal

•	Progress Rail, NS announce order of four locomotives powered by Caterpillar engines

•	Firefighters have BNSF tie fire under control

•	BNSF railroad yard's health impacts studied

•	French railway faces criticism in US for WWII role

•	Steamtown's Railfest on the right track

•	RRB: Summary of annual financial report to Congress

•	Credit for military service under the Railroad Retirement Act

•	Railroad Retirement Board 2010 informational conferences

More Headlines

Enter your e-mail address to receive BLET news updates.

Subscribe  Unsubscribe